Manuscript Author ManuscriptAcknowledgementNone Funding: The project described was supported by Award Number R01NR011990 (Conn-PI) from the National Institutes of Well being. The content material is solely the duty in the authors and doesn’t necessarily represent the official views on the National Institutes of Well being. The authors have no monetary support or personal connection which might be perceived to bias their function.
HHS Public AccessAuthor manuscriptThyroid. Author manuscript; readily available in PMC 2016 April 22.Published in final edited type as: Thyroid. 2013 April ; 23(4): 52021. doi:ten.1089/thy.2012.0217.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptMonitoring the Iodine Status of Pregnant Females inside the United StatesKevin M. Sullivan1,two, Cria G. Perrine1, Elizabeth N. Pearce3, and Kathleen L. Caldwell1Divisionof Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, National Center for Environmental Overall health, Centers for Illness Manage and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Well being, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia2Department 3Sectionof Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts4Divisionof Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia Dear Editor: Assuring adequate iodine nutrition is an significant public overall health task. In this letter, we describe the iodine status of pregnant females in the United states and go over the capability to monitor iodine status and trends. The iodine status of pregnant women within the United states of america has been of concern to some groups, and in October 2006, the Public Health Committee on the American Thyroid Association (ATA) encouraged day-to-day iodine supplementation throughout pregnancy and lactation inside the United states of america and Canada (1). In October 2011, the ATA Taskforce on Thyroid Illness in the course of Pregnancy and Postpartum endorsed day-to-day oral iodine supplementation for the duration of pregnancy and lactation in North America and added ladies arranging on becoming pregnant to this recommendation (two). In cross-sectional surveys, the iodine status of a population is usually assessed by means of the analysis of casual (or spot) urine specimens for urinary iodine concentration (UIC). A single spot UIC should not be utilised as an indicator of an individual’s iodine status, simply because the UIC can differ broadly inside an individual all through the day and at the same time as day-to-day (three). K ig et al. state that to estimate an individual’s iodine status requires ten repeat spot or 24hour urine collections (3). Therefore, even though a single spot urine specimen isn’t helpful for classifying an individual’s iodine status, the median urinary iodine has been employed to assess the iodine status of a population.IL-8/CXCL8, Human (HEK293, His) The Globe Health Organization (WHO) has formulated criteria to help in interpreting median urinary iodine levels (four).TGF beta 3/TGFB3 Protein medchemexpress For pregnant ladies, a median UIC of 150 g/L is classified as insufficient iodine intake, 15049 g/L asAddress correspondence to: Kevin M.PMID:25429455 Sullivan, PhD, MPH, MHA, Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Overall health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, [email protected]. Disclosure Statement The findings and conclusions in this report are these of the authors and don’t necessarily represent the official position with the Centers for Disease Handle and Prevention. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.Sullivan et al.Pageadequate, 2509.