), though there have been no differences inside the PT subscale (Mf 25.89 vs
), although there have been no differences PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18596346 in the PT subscale (Mf 25.89 vs Mm 24.2; F,320 .65; p 0.28) and inside the FS subscale (Mf 24.49 vs Mm 22.45; F,320 2.368; p 0.25; Figure ).BEESStatistical analyses showed significant most important effects of both Sex (F,347 3.798; p,0.00) and Lateral Correspondence (F,347 4.023; p,0.05): females scored higher (n 78; M 37.56) than males (n 74; M eight.93), and participants who imagined the action becoming MedChemExpress TA-02 performed with their dominant hand scored higher (n 309; M 29.7) than people who imagined the action getting performed with their nondominant hand (n 43; M 22.44). A important interaction amongst Sex and Lateral Correspondence (F,347 0.467; p,0.005) showed that the preceding final results have been because of females who imagined the action being performed with their dominant hand scoring significantly larger (n 54; M 39.79) than all the other groups (females, nondominant: n 24, M 23.25; males, dominant: n 55, M 8.62; males, nondominant: n 9, M two.42; all ps,0.00; p values adjustedAction Using scissors Employing a toothbrush Employing a spoonMatches 02 02Mismatches 7 0doi:0.37journal.pone.004595.tPLoS A single plosone.orgEmpathy Motor IdentificationFigure . Female and male participants’ scores around the IRI subscales (PT: Point of view Taking; FS: Fantasy; EC: Empathic Concern; PD: Personal Distress). doi:0.37journal.pone.004595.gwith the TukeyKramer strategy), even though there have been no variations involving these latter groups (Figure 2). Imagination taskWith regard to participants’ responses inside the imagination task, the present outcomes confirm these of our earlier study [3]: ) each righthanders and lefthanders preferentially imagined actions performed with their dominant rather than nondominanthand (even though this difference was substantial only for righthanders, possibly because the number of lefthanded participants was not enough to detect a rather moderate difference); two) when compared with lefthanders, righthanders reported a bigger proportion of matches in between their dominant hand and also the hand utilized by the imagined agent. As already proposed [3], the reduced proportion of matches vs mismatches in lefthanders may perhaps be attributed to each their greater visual familiarity with actions performed with their nondominant hand (inducing an incongruence between the visual experience of others’ actions and one’sFigure two. BEES scores as a function of Sex and Lateral Correspondence (D: dominant hand; ND: nondominant hand). doi:0.37journal.pone.004595.gPLoS One plosone.orgEmpathy Motor Identificationown encounter of selfmade actions) and their reduce typical absolute degree of lateralization, in line with previous study showing handednessrelated variations with regard to motor representations in both behavioral and functional measures [568].Selfreported empathyCompared to males, females exhibited larger empathy scores, along with the difference was specifically substantial for the emotional component of empathy, as apparent in participants’ responses to the IRI EC subscale as well as the BEES. This is consistent with past analysis employing selfreport data [59]. Our benefits supply fantastic (albeit not full) assistance for the hypothesis that participants imagining actions performed with their dominant hand would exhibit larger empathy compared to those imagining actions performed with their nondominant hand. In actual fact, the impact of lateral correspondence was due exclusively to girls, simply because female participants who imagined actions performed with their dominant.
