Of production of lipids in 3 T3-L1 cells treated with DMII
Of production of lipids in 3 T3-L1 cells treated with DMII alone or with DMII and CA extracts. The plant has also the potential to inhibit lipogenesis which can be figured out form the results in Figure 5. The cells treated with the DMII mixture plus120 d 100 Percentage of Lipid ( ) 80 60 a 40 20 0 Normal Control EtOAc c b80 g/ml of each extract separately resulted in 43 (MeOH), 52 (EtOAc), 37 (BuOH) and 36 (water) reduction of the lipid droplets respectively. The activity decreased with the concentration. The results for chloroform extract are not shown as it showed no PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28128382 significant activity. Very few or no research has been done related to anti-adipogenesis effect of ferns. So this study has been a representative study giving an idea that fern has also potential to show anti adipogenic activity. Figure 6 consists of photos of the oil red O stained adipocytes taken by Olympus microscope (Tokyo, Japan). Figure 6A, 6B, 6C, and 6D show the effect of EtOAc, MeOH, BuOH and H2O Ro4402257MedChemExpress R1503 extracts on the accumulation of lipid in 3 T3-L1 cells respectively at different concentration. The control group which was treated with the differentiation media only (DMII) is also shown together. The red spots are the regions of lipid accumulation which is visible when stained by oil redc bc bc baa a 20 ug/ml 40 ug/ml 80 ug/mlMeOHBuOHWaterExtract of CAFigure 5 Effect of CA extracts on adipogenesis of 3 T3-L1 cells. The cells were treated with DMII alone (control) or with DMII and CA extracts. Normal group were cultured with normal media. The 3 T3-L1 cells were fully differentiated by 8 days, and the accumulation of lipids was measured by Oil red O staining. Each value is average of three analysis ?standard deviation. Mean with different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 compared to the control according to one-way ANOVA post-hoc Ducan Multiple Range tests.Lamichhane et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2014, 14:342 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/14/Page 8 ofABg/ml 40 g/ml 20 g/ml Controlg/ml 40 g/ml 20 g/ml ControlCDg/ml 40 g/ml 20 g/ml Controlg/ml 40 g/ml 20 g/ml ControlFigure 6 Oil red O stained 3 T3-L1 adipocytes treated with DMII and extracts MeOH extract (A), EtOAc extract (B) BuOH extract (C) and water extract (D) or DMII alone (control). The concentrations of samples were 80, 40, and 20 g/ml. The lipid produced after differentiation till Day 8 was stained with Oil red O staining agent and pictures were taken using microscope. The red circular bands are the lipid produced during differentiation.O. We can see suppression of adipogenesis (decrease in staining) with the increase in concentration of the extract. The EtOAc fraction (A) showed a greater suppression compared to other fractions.In vivo assay (Animal experiment) Body weight, food intake and food efficiency ratioAssessment of potential toxicological effectsThe effect of extracts on the body weight gain, food intake and food efficiency were examined in Table 4. The final body weight of the HFD group was significantly higher than that of the ND group. However, in the group fed with crude methanol extract (HFD-M) and phenolic fraction (HFD-P) the final body weight was decreased by 19.04 and 14.81 respectively. Since there was not so difference in the food intake among the control and sample groups, the results indicated that the treatment of extract did not affect the food intake. The reduction of body weight gain was not due to food intake pattern but due to.
