Ression in the last year (0 = no, 1 = yes) were entered as predictors of later RR6 site relationship status (0 = broke-up, 1 = together). The results indicated that, compared to those with no history of aggression, those who T0901317 chemical information experienced aggression in the last year were significantly less likely to be together twelve months later (B = -.46, SE = .15, Wald = 9.97, Odds ratio = .63, p < .01). In contrast, violence in the past but not the last year was not a significant predictor of later relationship status. Thus, our hypothesis regarding stability was supported; 26.7 (n = 149) of those with no history of aggression, 30.4 (n = 41) of those who had experienced aggression in the past, but not in the last year, and 36.5 (n = 134) of those who experienced aggression in the last year broke up. A follow-up logistic regression with gender X aggression history interactions indicated that this finding was not moderated by gender. Physical Aggression and Indices of Commitment (Hypothesis 2) We predicted that having a history of physical aggression would be related to lower dedication and more barriers to leaving (or constraints). To test this prediction, we examined the bivariate relationships between indices of commitment and having never experienced aggression in the current relationship, having experienced aggression at some point, but not in the past year, or having experienced aggression within the last year. Results from these one-way ANOVAs and chi-squares are presented in Table 1. The findings indicated several significant differences between those who had never experienced aggression and those who had experienced aggression within the last year. Those with no history of aggression were more dedicated, experienced less felt constraint, and reported fewer constraints in terms of alternative quality of life, structural investments, and termination procedures, as well as more social pressure to stay together. They also had been in their relationships for a shorter period of time, were less likely to have children with their partners, and were less likely to be cohabiting compared to those who had experienced aggression in the past year. Similar differences existed between those with no aggression and those who had experienced aggression, but not in the last year. Specifically, those with no aggression reported less felt constraint, fewer material constraints, shorter relationship duration, a lower likelihood of having children together and of living together as well as fewer constraints in terms of alternative quality of life, structural investments, and termination procedures than those with a past history of aggression. Lastly, significant differences also existed between those who had experienced aggression within the last year and those who had experienced it, but not in the past year; those with recent experience had lower dedication, higher felt constraint, less social pressure to stay together, as well as fewer material constraints and shorter relationship duration. Thus, overall, our hypotheses about differences on commitment indices based on history of physical aggression were supported. A history of aggression was generally associated with less dedication and more constraints. The largest differences appeared to between those with no history of aggression and those who had experienced aggression in the last year. To check for gender moderation for the indices of commitment and their association with history of aggression (hypothesis 2), we.Ression in the last year (0 = no, 1 = yes) were entered as predictors of later relationship status (0 = broke-up, 1 = together). The results indicated that, compared to those with no history of aggression, those who experienced aggression in the last year were significantly less likely to be together twelve months later (B = -.46, SE = .15, Wald = 9.97, Odds ratio = .63, p < .01). In contrast, violence in the past but not the last year was not a significant predictor of later relationship status. Thus, our hypothesis regarding stability was supported; 26.7 (n = 149) of those with no history of aggression, 30.4 (n = 41) of those who had experienced aggression in the past, but not in the last year, and 36.5 (n = 134) of those who experienced aggression in the last year broke up. A follow-up logistic regression with gender X aggression history interactions indicated that this finding was not moderated by gender. Physical Aggression and Indices of Commitment (Hypothesis 2) We predicted that having a history of physical aggression would be related to lower dedication and more barriers to leaving (or constraints). To test this prediction, we examined the bivariate relationships between indices of commitment and having never experienced aggression in the current relationship, having experienced aggression at some point, but not in the past year, or having experienced aggression within the last year. Results from these one-way ANOVAs and chi-squares are presented in Table 1. The findings indicated several significant differences between those who had never experienced aggression and those who had experienced aggression within the last year. Those with no history of aggression were more dedicated, experienced less felt constraint, and reported fewer constraints in terms of alternative quality of life, structural investments, and termination procedures, as well as more social pressure to stay together. They also had been in their relationships for a shorter period of time, were less likely to have children with their partners, and were less likely to be cohabiting compared to those who had experienced aggression in the past year. Similar differences existed between those with no aggression and those who had experienced aggression, but not in the last year. Specifically, those with no aggression reported less felt constraint, fewer material constraints, shorter relationship duration, a lower likelihood of having children together and of living together as well as fewer constraints in terms of alternative quality of life, structural investments, and termination procedures than those with a past history of aggression. Lastly, significant differences also existed between those who had experienced aggression within the last year and those who had experienced it, but not in the past year; those with recent experience had lower dedication, higher felt constraint, less social pressure to stay together, as well as fewer material constraints and shorter relationship duration. Thus, overall, our hypotheses about differences on commitment indices based on history of physical aggression were supported. A history of aggression was generally associated with less dedication and more constraints. The largest differences appeared to between those with no history of aggression and those who had experienced aggression in the last year. To check for gender moderation for the indices of commitment and their association with history of aggression (hypothesis 2), we.
