Ies is that emotions constitute a form of action readiness that adapt people to their environment and therefore promote their mental health. From this perspective, change occurs by encouraging the patients to make sense of their emotions through awareness, expression, regulation, reflection, and transformation (79,80). However, the mental health outcomes of emotional expression are presumed to be determined by cultural value orientations (81,82,83,84). For instance, in a recent cross-cultural study conducted in 23 countries (82), individualism, egalitarianism, and autonomy were shown to be associated with less frequent use of expressive suppression because of the fact that some cultures encourage assertiveness and free and open emotional expression. On the other hand, collectivism, hierarchy, and relatedness have been shown to be positively associated with the use of expressive suppression because of the fact that some cultures discourage assertiveness and encourage self-regulation to maintain social order and harmony (85). These alpha-AmanitinMedChemExpress ��-Amanitin results are also supported by evidence from facial expression literature (86,87), illustrating that individuals with collectivistic backgrounds tend to control (e.g., mask or neutralize) the display of their feelings more than individuals in samples from individualistic societies do. It is wellArch Neuropsychiatr 2016; 53: 72-Balkir Neft et al. Depression Among Turkish Patients in Europeestablished and in line with these arguments that the consequences of emotional suppression for mental health are also culture dependent. For instance, in studies conducted with samples from Western individualistic cultures (e.g., Euro-American or European), expressive suppression has been shown to be related to poorer mental health (88,89,90,91), which is more likely to be employed by get Enasidenib depressed individuals (89). In contrast, it has been revealed that in collectivistic cultures emotional suppression was used more frequently (89) and was related to lower levels of negative emotion and better mental health (92,93,94) than those in individualistic cultures. A recent study investigated the use of expressive suppression and the resulting implications for psychopathology among healthy and depressed Turkish immigrant and German women (95). The results indicated that expressive suppression was associated with lower levels of psychopathology in healthy Turkish women, but not in their healthy German counterparts. It was illustrated that the positive mental health outcomes of expressive suppression in Turkish women could be attributed to their more flexible use of emotion regulation strategies (i.e., additional use of other emotional regulation strategies such as cognitive reappraisal). However, cultural differences in the mental health outcomes of suppression were absent in depressed samples. Both groups-depressed Turkish and depressed German women-exhibited a rigid use of expressive suppression (without any other emotion regulation strategies) and suppression was positively associated with psychopathology. These results are in line with the literature, showing that depression is not related to specific emotion regulation strategies (e.g., frequent use of expressive suppression), but that it is rather associated with an inflexible use of specific strategies (e.g., rigid use of suppression) and the disability to adjust emotional responses to changing situations (96). Therefore, it can be concluded, especially for Turkish depressed patien.Ies is that emotions constitute a form of action readiness that adapt people to their environment and therefore promote their mental health. From this perspective, change occurs by encouraging the patients to make sense of their emotions through awareness, expression, regulation, reflection, and transformation (79,80). However, the mental health outcomes of emotional expression are presumed to be determined by cultural value orientations (81,82,83,84). For instance, in a recent cross-cultural study conducted in 23 countries (82), individualism, egalitarianism, and autonomy were shown to be associated with less frequent use of expressive suppression because of the fact that some cultures encourage assertiveness and free and open emotional expression. On the other hand, collectivism, hierarchy, and relatedness have been shown to be positively associated with the use of expressive suppression because of the fact that some cultures discourage assertiveness and encourage self-regulation to maintain social order and harmony (85). These results are also supported by evidence from facial expression literature (86,87), illustrating that individuals with collectivistic backgrounds tend to control (e.g., mask or neutralize) the display of their feelings more than individuals in samples from individualistic societies do. It is wellArch Neuropsychiatr 2016; 53: 72-Balkir Neft et al. Depression Among Turkish Patients in Europeestablished and in line with these arguments that the consequences of emotional suppression for mental health are also culture dependent. For instance, in studies conducted with samples from Western individualistic cultures (e.g., Euro-American or European), expressive suppression has been shown to be related to poorer mental health (88,89,90,91), which is more likely to be employed by depressed individuals (89). In contrast, it has been revealed that in collectivistic cultures emotional suppression was used more frequently (89) and was related to lower levels of negative emotion and better mental health (92,93,94) than those in individualistic cultures. A recent study investigated the use of expressive suppression and the resulting implications for psychopathology among healthy and depressed Turkish immigrant and German women (95). The results indicated that expressive suppression was associated with lower levels of psychopathology in healthy Turkish women, but not in their healthy German counterparts. It was illustrated that the positive mental health outcomes of expressive suppression in Turkish women could be attributed to their more flexible use of emotion regulation strategies (i.e., additional use of other emotional regulation strategies such as cognitive reappraisal). However, cultural differences in the mental health outcomes of suppression were absent in depressed samples. Both groups-depressed Turkish and depressed German women-exhibited a rigid use of expressive suppression (without any other emotion regulation strategies) and suppression was positively associated with psychopathology. These results are in line with the literature, showing that depression is not related to specific emotion regulation strategies (e.g., frequent use of expressive suppression), but that it is rather associated with an inflexible use of specific strategies (e.g., rigid use of suppression) and the disability to adjust emotional responses to changing situations (96). Therefore, it can be concluded, especially for Turkish depressed patien.
