Of peak symptoms, and symptom progression vary over time between individuals (Fig. 1), the rise and fall of the gene expression based factor score varies as well, and a common factor trajectory can be mathematically imputed for all symptomatic subjects (Fig. 3a ). The trajectory of the Influenza Factor for symptomatic, infected individuals first Emixustat (hydrochloride) begins to diverge from asymptomatic, uninfected individuals at 35?0 of the elapsed time between inoculation and the time of 
maximal symptoms for each individual (38 hours post-inoculation for H1N1 and 29 hours for H3N2, Fig. 3a ). Even in this controlled challenge study among young, healthy individuals, we find variability in this temporal relationship, similar to the individual variability seen with symptom scores. In most symptomatic individuals, the rise, peak, and fall of the factor score trajectory tends to mimic in character but precede the changes in the clinical score (Fig. s6). Even with this variability and relatively limited sample size (9 symptomatic-infected individuals in each study), the symptomatic-infected factor trajectory diverges byhours (H3N2, p-value = 0.005) and 60 hours (H1N1, p-value = 0.003) post-inoculation. We developed Receiver Operating 301353-96-8 web Characteristic (ROC) curves at each time point to visualize the ability of the Influenza Factor to discriminate between symptomatic- infected and asymptomaticuninfected subjects (Figure s7). For H3N2 infection, the factors can distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals with a sensitivity of 89 without false positives at 53 hours postexposure. By 69 hours post-inoculation the sensitivity is increased to 100 . For H1N1, this occurs slightly later but by 60 hours postexposure the Influenza Factor demonstrates a sensitivity of 89 without false positives. These time points that the gene signature first effectively discriminates symptomatic vs. asymptomatic subjects usually precede or coincide with the time of average first symptom onset (49 hrs for H3N2 and 61 hours for H1N1), and occur well before clinically significant symptoms (38 hours before maximal symptoms for H3N2 and 43 hours for H1N1).The Influenza Factor Accurately Identifies Pandemic 2009 H1N1 Infections in a Clinical CohortIn order to assess the validity of the experimentally derived Influenza Factor to perform in a 23727046 free-living (non-experimental) setting we used a cohort of individuals enrolled 1326631 during the 2009?10 Influenza season. At that time, we identified 36 individuals who presented to the Duke University Hospital emergency department with symptomatic H1N1 infection (confirmed by RT-PCR), and 45 healthy controls. Peripheral blood RNA samples were obtained from the symptomatic individuals at the time of presentation with symptomatic respiratory viral infection. The Influenza Factor was applied to the microarray data derived from the blood RNA samples and correctly identifies 92 (33/36) of the subjects asFigure 4. Validation of the Influenza Factor in a real-world cohort of individuals presenting with confirmed swine-origin 2009 A/ H1N1 infection. The Influenza Factor scores distinguish individuals with RT-PCR proven H1N1 infection ( ) from healthy individuals (#) as demonstrated both by factor score and by ROC curve for healthy vs. H1N1 (insert, AUC 0.98). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052198.gNHost Genomic Signatures Detect H1N1 Infectioninfected with Novel H1N1, and correctly identified 93 (42/45) 
of the healthy controls (Fig. 4). Overall, the Influen.Of peak symptoms, and symptom progression vary over time between individuals (Fig. 1), the rise and fall of the gene expression based factor score varies as well, and a common factor trajectory can be mathematically imputed for all symptomatic subjects (Fig. 3a ). The trajectory of the Influenza Factor for symptomatic, infected individuals first begins to diverge from asymptomatic, uninfected individuals at 35?0 of the elapsed time between inoculation and the time of maximal symptoms for each individual (38 hours post-inoculation for H1N1 and 29 hours for H3N2, Fig. 3a ). Even in this controlled challenge study among young, healthy individuals, we find variability in this temporal relationship, similar to the individual variability seen with symptom scores. In most symptomatic individuals, the rise, peak, and fall of the factor score trajectory tends to mimic in character but precede the changes in the clinical score (Fig. s6). Even with this variability and relatively limited sample size (9 symptomatic-infected individuals in each study), the symptomatic-infected factor trajectory diverges byhours (H3N2, p-value = 0.005) and 60 hours (H1N1, p-value = 0.003) post-inoculation. We developed Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves at each time point to visualize the ability of the Influenza Factor to discriminate between symptomatic- infected and asymptomaticuninfected subjects (Figure s7). For H3N2 infection, the factors can distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals with a sensitivity of 89 without false positives at 53 hours postexposure. By 69 hours post-inoculation the sensitivity is increased to 100 . For H1N1, this occurs slightly later but by 60 hours postexposure the Influenza Factor demonstrates a sensitivity of 89 without false positives. These time points that the gene signature first effectively discriminates symptomatic vs. asymptomatic subjects usually precede or coincide with the time of average first symptom onset (49 hrs for H3N2 and 61 hours for H1N1), and occur well before clinically significant symptoms (38 hours before maximal symptoms for H3N2 and 43 hours for H1N1).The Influenza Factor Accurately Identifies Pandemic 2009 H1N1 Infections in a Clinical CohortIn order to assess the validity of the experimentally derived Influenza Factor to perform in a 23727046 free-living (non-experimental) setting we used a cohort of individuals enrolled 1326631 during the 2009?10 Influenza season. At that time, we identified 36 individuals who presented to the Duke University Hospital emergency department with symptomatic H1N1 infection (confirmed by RT-PCR), and 45 healthy controls. Peripheral blood RNA samples were obtained from the symptomatic individuals at the time of presentation with symptomatic respiratory viral infection. The Influenza Factor was applied to the microarray data derived from the blood RNA samples and correctly identifies 92 (33/36) of the subjects asFigure 4. Validation of the Influenza Factor in a real-world cohort of individuals presenting with confirmed swine-origin 2009 A/ H1N1 infection. The Influenza Factor scores distinguish individuals with RT-PCR proven H1N1 infection ( ) from healthy individuals (#) as demonstrated both by factor score and by ROC curve for healthy vs. H1N1 (insert, AUC 0.98). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052198.gNHost Genomic Signatures Detect H1N1 Infectioninfected with Novel H1N1, and correctly identified 93 (42/45) of the healthy controls (Fig. 4). Overall, the Influen.
